DIGITAL HEALTH TRANSFORMATION AND UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE ACCESS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: A QUALITATIVE METASYNTHESIS

Authors

  • Jobel A. Nuval Author

Keywords:

digital health, universal health coverage, developing countries, low- and middle-income countries

Abstract

Background. Universal health coverage (UHC) remains unevenly realized across developing countries, and digital health transformation is widely promoted as a lever for closing access gaps. Yet evidence on how and why digital transformation advances or obstructs equitable access is fragmented across heterogeneous qualitative studies, limiting cumulative understanding.

Objective. To interpretively integrate qualitative evidence on the relationship between digital health transformation and UHC access in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and to construct a higher-order explanatory model of the contextual mechanisms involved.

Methods. A qualitative metasynthesis was conducted following Noblit and Hare’s seven-phase meta-ethnography and reported against the ENTREQ statement. Six databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Global Health) plus grey literature were searched for qualitative and mixed-methods studies (2014–2024). Eligibility was framed with SPIDER; selection followed PRISMA 2020 with dual independent screening; methodological quality was appraised with the CASP checklist. First- and second-order constructs were translated reciprocally and refutationally into third-order constructs and a line-of-argument synthesis.

Results. Twenty-two studies from 17 LMICs (n ≈ 642 participants) were synthesized. Six third-order constructs were generated: (1) the connectivity and energy substrate as a precondition; (2) digital literacy and the human interface; (3) governance, interoperability, and institutional embedding; (4) trust, confidentiality, and sociocultural fit; (5) financing, “pilotitis,” and the sustainability gap; and (6) the equity paradox of simultaneous bridging and widening of access. The line-of-argument synthesis frames digital health as a contingent amplifier: it magnifies existing health-system capacity and pre-existing inequities rather than acting as an autonomous equalizer.

References

Atkins, S., Lewin, S., Smith, H., Engel, M., Fretheim, A., & Volmink, J. (2008). Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21

Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002). Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: A worked example. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7(4), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581902320432732

Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938

Countdown to 2030 Collaboration. (2025). Overview of current and planned health financing reforms for universal health coverage in the WHO African Region. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12333-5

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2018). CASP qualitative studies checklist. CASP UK. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/

France, E. F., Cunningham, M., Ring, N., Uny, I., Duncan, E. A. S., Jepson, R. G., … Noyes, J. (2019). Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0

Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., A’Court, C., … Shaw, S. (2017). Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies (NASSS). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(11), e367. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8775

International Telecommunication Union. (2024). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2024. ITU Publications. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/facts-figures-2024/

Kaboré, S. S., Ngangue, P., Soubeiga, D., Barro, A., Pilabré, A. H., Bationo, N., … Savadogo, G. B. L. (2022). Barriers and facilitators for the sustainability of digital health interventions in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, 1014375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1014375

Labrique, A. B., Vasudevan, L., Kochi, E., Fabricant, R., & Mehl, G. (2013). mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Global Health: Science and Practice, 1(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00031

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Mehl, G., & Labrique, A. (2014). Prioritizing integrated mHealth strategies for universal health coverage. Science, 345(6202), 1284–1287. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258926

Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer.

Schütz, A. (1962). Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. Martinus Nijhoff.

Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012). Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 181. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). United Nations.

Victora, C. G., Vaughan, J. P., Barros, F. C., Silva, A. C., & Tomasi, E. (2000). Explaining trends in inequities: Evidence from Brazilian child health studies. The Lancet, 356(9235), 1093–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02741-0

World Health Organization, & World Bank. (2025). Tracking universal health coverage: 2025 global monitoring report. World Health Organization & World Bank.

World Health Organization. (2019). WHO guideline: Recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2021). Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240020924

World Health Organization. (2025a, December 6). Most countries make progress towards universal health coverage, but major challenges remain, WHO–World Bank report finds [News release]. https://www.who.int/news

World Health Organization. (2025b, May 23). World Health Assembly endorses extension of the Global Strategy on Digital Health to 2027 [News release]. https://www.who.int/news

Downloads

Published

2026-07-03

How to Cite

DIGITAL HEALTH TRANSFORMATION AND UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE ACCESS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: A QUALITATIVE METASYNTHESIS. (2026). Journal for the Advancement of Sustainable Development Goals, 1(2). https://jasdg.com/index.php/jasdg/article/view/7