MOTIVATIONAL PRACTICES OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS AS PERCEIVED BY THE TEACHERS AND THEMSELVES IN MARAWI CITY DIVISION

Authors

Keywords:

school principals, motivational practices, teacher motivation, teaching efficiency rating, Maranao, Islamic values, Marawi City

Abstract

How school principals motivate their teachers bears on teacher morale, job satisfaction, and teaching performance. Little is documented on how teachers and principals perceive these practices in the Muslim, predominantly Maranao setting of Marawi City. To determine the teachers’ and the principals’ perceptions of the principals’ motivational practices (intrinsic, extrinsic, negative, and other practices linked to cultural and Islamic concepts) in the Marawi City Division, Lanao del Sur, school year 2007–2008; to describe both groups’ profiles and the teachers’ teaching efficiency rating (TER); and to test the difference between the two groups’ perceptions and the relationship between TER and teachers’ perceptions. A descriptive-correlational design was used with all 38 principals and 272 teachers drawn by stratified random sampling (Slovin’s formula) from the nine supervisory districts. Data came from a self-made structured questionnaire rated on a five-point scale and a personal information sheet. Analysis used frequency and percentage, weighted mean, Pearson’s r, and t-tests at the 0.05 level in Microsoft Excel. Typical teachers were female (99.26%), married (80.88%), aged 40–50 years (40.44%), and B.E.Ed. graduates (62.50%), with 11–15 years of service (36.76%); their TER was Very Satisfactory (mean 2.87). Half of the principals were 50 or older; most were female (84.21%), married (89.47%), and B.E.Ed. holders with M.A. units (47.37%). Teachers rated the principals’ intrinsic practices as “always practiced” (mean 4.42), extrinsic and cultural–Islamic practices as “often practiced” (4.10 and 4.19), and negative practices as “sometimes practiced” (2.91). Principals rated their intrinsic (4.64), extrinsic (4.46), and cultural–Islamic (4.41) practices “always practiced” and their negative practices “often practiced” (3.52). The thesis reports no significant difference between the two groups’ perceptions (t = −28.57 against a critical value of 1.96; see Statistical note in Section 4.4) and no significant relationship between TER and teachers’ perceptions (r = 0.076, t = 1.24). Principals in the division are perceived by both groups to rely chiefly on intrinsic motivation, supported by extrinsic rewards and by practices rooted in Islamic and Maranao values; negative practices are used sparingly. The findings point to the importance of promotion, professional growth, and principals’ role modeling, and the thesis recommends graduate study for administrators, continued support for teachers’ competence and commitment, and further research on culturally grounded motivation.

References

Barber, M. G. (1993). A study of the relationship between performance appraisal system and promotion as perceived by the employee: A case study in the Civil Service Commission, Region 12.

Brooks, I. (1999). Organizational behavior. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall.

Calmorin, L. (1994). Educational research, measurement and evaluation. Manila: National Book Store.

Clarke, A., & Erickson, G. (2003). Research inquiry: Living the research in everyday practice. New York: British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

Dasmarinas, H. S. (2005). Motivators/hygiene factor and job satisfaction among employees of BIR Office at Iligan (Unpublished master’s thesis). Graduate School, Mindanao State University, Marawi City.

Diron, S. M. (1996). Status of master teachers in Marawi City Division and their effects on job satisfaction and performance (Unpublished master’s thesis). Graduate School, Mindanao State University, Marawi City.

Doctora, L. (1995). Leadership style and employee job satisfaction in the ARMM (Unpublished master’s thesis). Graduate School, Mindanao State University, Marawi City.

Gibson, J. L., et al. (1997). Organizational behavior: Structure and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hanks, K. (1991). Motivating people. California: Crisp Publication, Inc. Lucar, M. P. D., & Corpuz, B. B. (2007). Facilitating learning: A metacognitive process. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing.

Laguindab, M. A. (1995). Leadership [“Among” appears before “Behavior” in the thesis] behavior and motivation needs of public and private secondary schools administrators in the School Division of Marawi City and Lanao del Sur 1: Basis for improving secondary school management (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Graduate School, Mindanao State University, Marawi City.

Mullins, L. J. (1999). Management and organizational behavior (5th ed.). Harlow, England: Prentice Hall.

Petri, H. (1996). Motivation: Theory, research, application. London: Thomson, Inc.

Robbins, S. P. (2000). Organizational behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Rollinson, D. (2002). Organizational behavior and analysis: An integrated approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Sarip, H. J. M. (2000). Assessment of the integration of Islamic values in the teaching of technology and home economics in the public secondary schools of LDS (Unpublished master’s thesis). Graduate School, Mindanao State University, Marawi City.

Spector, P. (1995). Industrial and organizational psychology: Research and practice. Chester: Wiley, Inc.

Weiner [printed “Witner”], B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories and research. London: Sage.

Zulueta, F. M., & Magtaya, E. M. (2007). Foundation of education. Mandaluyong City: National Book Store, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-22

How to Cite

MOTIVATIONAL PRACTICES OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS AS PERCEIVED BY THE TEACHERS AND THEMSELVES IN MARAWI CITY DIVISION. (2026). Journal for the Advancement of Sustainable Development Goals, 1(4). https://jasdg.com/index.php/jasdg/article/view/187