OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY AND MARKETING EFFECTIVENESS AS PREDICTORS OF BUSINESS PERFORMANCE IN THE FOOD MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY

Authors

  • Anjo M. Evora Food Manufacturing Industry , Holy Angel University image/svg+xml Author

Keywords:

Operational efficiency, marketing effectiveness, business performance, food manufacturing industry, Pampanga

Abstract

Operational efficiency and marketing effectiveness are internal capabilities that shape how food manufacturers convert limited resources into business results. This study examined operational efficiency and marketing effectiveness as predictors of business performance among selected food manufacturing enterprises in Pampanga. Specifically, it determined the demographic and business profiles of respondents, assessed the levels of operational efficiency, marketing effectiveness, and business performance, examined the significant relationships among these variables, and identified their individual and combined predictive contributions. The study employed a quantitative, descriptive-correlational (predictive-correlational) research design involving 250 respondents, composed of business owners, operations managers, marketing managers, production supervisors, and other qualified managerial personnel, who were selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered using a structured, four-point survey questionnaire and analyzed through frequency counts, percentages, weighted means, standard deviations, Pearson’s product-moment correlation, and multiple linear regression analysis at the .05 level of significance. The illustrative findings revealed very high levels of operational efficiency, marketing effectiveness, and business performance, with overall weighted means of 3.34, 3.33, and 3.31, respectively. Operational efficiency and marketing effectiveness showed significant positive relationships with business performance (r = 0.620 and r = 0.580, respectively; both p < .001). Multiple regression analysis indicated that both variables significantly predicted business performance and collectively explained approximately 49.8% of its variation, with operational efficiency emerging as the stronger predictor (β = 0.450 versus β = 0.377). Operational and marketing capabilities were significantly associated with organizational performance, although causal relationships were not established. The findings contribute to understanding the organizational factors associated with business performance in Pampanga’s food manufacturing industry.

Author Biography

  • Anjo M. Evora, Food Manufacturing Industry, Holy Angel University

    Commissary Manager

References

Adalim, K. F., Aquino, M. P., Bacan, C. J. D., Koothiah, F., Lazarte, R. C., Mariano, R. A., Olaguer, J. R. A., Olmido, M. D. D., Palanas, M. T., Pasaol, A. P. R., Saragena, M. A. A., & Sayon, V. M. R. (2025). Assessing inventory strategies on business performance among food manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(4), 695–723. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90400053

Aranzamendez, C. H. N., An, C. M., Briones, J., & Abante, M. V. (2025). Impact of supply chain management on organizational sustainability: The case of a Philippine food manufacturing company. Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31098/jgrcs.v5i1.2816

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Bodlaj, M., & Čater, B. (2022). Responsive and proactive market orientation in relation to SMEs’ export venture performance: The mediating role of marketing capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 138, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.034

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Chen, Z. (2022). An empirical examination on the links of cross-functional integration of production-marketing, BTO competitiveness and performance. European Journal of Management Studies, 27(2), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMS-06-2021-0053

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book270550

Gupta, P., & Chauhan, S. (2021). Firm capabilities and export performance of small firms: A meta-analytical review. European Management Journal, 39(5), 558–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.12.003

Handoyo, S., Suharman, H., Ghani, E. K., & Soedarsono, S. (2023). A business strategy, operational efficiency, ownership structure, and manufacturing performance: The moderating role of market uncertainty and competition intensity and its implication on open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), Article 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100039

Herhausen, D., Miočević, D., Morgan, R. E., & Kleijnen, M. H. P. (2020). The digital marketing capabilities gap. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.022

Homburg, C., & Wielgos, D. M. (2022). The value relevance of digital marketing capabilities to firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(4), 666–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00858-7

Kanellos, N., Karountzos, P., Giannakopoulos, N. T., Terzi, M. C., & Sakas, D. P. (2024). Digital marketing strategies and profitability in the agri-food industry: Resource efficiency and value chains. Sustainability, 16(14), Article 5889. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145889

Mandler, T., Sezen, B., Chen, J., & Özsomer, A. (2021). Performance consequences of marketing standardization/adaptation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 125, 416–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.023

Maratis, M., Lily, J., Chew, T. C., & Sulong, R. S. (2023). Conceptual framework on market orientation and performance of SMEs: Alliances as mediating. Malaysian Journal of Business and Economics, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.51200/mjbe.v9i1.4544

Naz, S., Haq, N. U., & Nasir, S. (2022). Capabilities pathway to firm performance: Moderating role of environmental dynamism in the food manufacturing firms of Pakistan. International Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391962250030X

Nurcahyo, R., Zulfadlillah, & Habiburrahman, M. (2021). Relationship between ISO 9001:2015 and operational and business performance of manufacturing industries in a developing country (Indonesia). Heliyon, 7(1), Article e05537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05537

Olazo, D. B. (2024). Marketing competency, marketing innovation and sustainable competitive advantage among small and medium enterprises in Pampanga. De La Salle University Animo Repository. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/14420/

Republic Act No. 10173. (2012). Data Privacy Act of 2012. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/

Saifudin, A., & Pasiama, H. (2022). Orientasi kewirausahaan dan kapabilitas pemasaran pada kinerja usaha kecil dan menengah: Peran faktor lingkungan yang dinamis sebagai pemoderasi. Cakrawala, 29(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.56070/cakrawala.v29i1.21

Samsuden, N. S., Kohar, U. H. A., Khatib, S. F. A., & Abbas, A. F. (2024). Digital capabilities and business performance: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 16(24), Article 11108. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411108

Sharafuddin, M. A., & Janarthanam, S. (2025). Why method matters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the marketing capability–performance relationship. Encyclopedia, 5(4), Article 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5040212

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Tolstoy, D., Nordman, E. R., & Vu, U. (2022). The indirect effect of online marketing capabilities on the international performance of e-commerce SMEs. International Business Review, 31(3), Article 101946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101946

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

Vieira, V. A., De Toni, D., & Agnihotri, R. S. (2026). Foundations of marketing capabilities across 25-year: The role of competitive and innovation indexes in establishing firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 133, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2026.02.001

Zhou, X., Zhu, Q., & Xu, Z. (2022). The mediating role of supply chain quality management for traceability and performance improvement: Evidence among Chinese food firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 254, Article 108630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108630

Downloads

Published

2026-10-20

How to Cite

OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY AND MARKETING EFFECTIVENESS AS PREDICTORS OF BUSINESS PERFORMANCE IN THE FOOD MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY. (2026). Journal for the Advancement of Sustainable Development Goals, 1(4). https://jasdg.com/index.php/jasdg/article/view/180